Understanding the Difference between Bagging and Boosting

Bagging and boosting are both ensemble learning techniques used in machine learning to improve the performance of models. Although they share the common goal of combining multiple weak learners to create a strong learner, they differ significantly in their approach and implementation.

Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating)

Bagging is a technique where multiple instances of the same base learning algorithm are trained on different subsets of the training data. These subsets are created through bootstrap sampling, which involves randomly selecting samples with replacements from the original dataset.

Here’s how bagging works:

  • Random subsets of the training data are created through bootstrap sampling.
  • A base learning algorithm (e.g., decision trees) is trained on each subset independently.
  • The predictions from all the base learners are combined through averaging (for regression) or voting (for classification).
  • The combined predictions result in the final output.

Bagging helps to reduce variance and overfitting by averaging out the predictions from multiple models trained on different subsets of data. Popular bagging algorithms include Random Forest, which is an ensemble of decision trees trained using bagging.


Boosting, on the other hand, is a sequential ensemble learning technique that works by building a series of weak learners, each focusing on the mistakes of its predecessor. Unlike bagging, where base learners are trained independently, boosting trains learners sequentially, with each new learner attempting to correct the errors made by the combined ensemble of the previous models.

Here’s how boosting works:

  • A base learning algorithm (e.g., decision trees) is trained on the entire dataset.
  • Instances that are misclassified or have higher errors are given higher weights.
  • The next base learner is then trained on the modified dataset, where the emphasis is placed on correctly classifying the previously misclassified instances.
  • This process is repeated for a specified number of iterations or until a desired level of accuracy is achieved.

Popular boosting algorithms include AdaBoost (Adaptive Boosting) and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM). Boosting often results in models with lower bias and lower variance compared to individual base learners.

Differences between Bagging and Boosting

While both bagging and boosting are ensemble learning techniques, they differ in several key aspects:

  1. Training Approach: Bagging trains multiple base learners independently on random subsets of data, while boosting trains learners sequentially, focusing on correcting the errors made by the ensemble.
  2. Weighting of Instances: In boosting, instances that are misclassified or have higher errors are given higher weights, whereas in bagging, all instances are weighted equally.
  3. Final Prediction: Bagging combines predictions through averaging or voting, while boosting combines predictions by giving more weight to the predictions of more accurate models.
  4. Variance Reduction: Bagging aims to reduce variance and overfitting by averaging predictions from multiple models, whereas boosting focuses on reducing bias by iteratively improving the model’s ability to generalize.
  5. Base Learner Dependency: Base learners in bagging are typically trained independently, whereas in boosting, the performance of each base learner depends on the performance of its predecessors.

In conclusion, while both bagging and boosting are powerful ensemble learning techniques that can improve model performance, they differ in their approach to combining multiple weak learners. Understanding the differences between bagging and boosting is crucial for selecting the appropriate ensemble method based on the characteristics of the dataset and the problem at hand.

See Also

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *